[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e5e476b0912081246w32a9ae1bw7d49b0285719b22e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:46:39 +0100
From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: reduce write depth only if sync was delayed
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com> wrote:
> Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com> writes:
>
>> The introduction of ramp-up formula for async queue depths has
>> slowed down dirty page reclaim, by reducing async write performance.
>> This patch makes sure the formula kicks in only when sync request
>> was recently delayed.
>> @@ -3706,7 +3707,7 @@ static void *cfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>> cfqd->cfq_latency = 1;
>> cfqd->cfq_group_isolation = 0;
>> cfqd->hw_tag = -1;
>> - cfqd->last_end_sync_rq = jiffies;
>> + cfqd->last_delayed_sync = jiffies - HZ;
>
> So, umm, what's that about?
Previously, when cfq started, it started in a state where writes were
completely throttled. Now, we optimistically prefer to start with a
reasonable max depth (10)
Thanks
Corrado
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
--
__________________________________________________________________________
dott. Corrado Zoccolo mailto:czoccolo@...il.com
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average
man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls
that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and
calls that humbleness.
Tales of Power - C. Castaneda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists