[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f1b08da0912071805m7bbd65cdhfcf9284379bbe23c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:05:02 -0800
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Ioannis Kyriakopoulos <johnkyr83@...mail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: timer interrupt stucks using tickless kernel
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Ioannis Kyriakopoulos
<johnkyr83@...mail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the valuable help so far.
>
>>> 2. When performing cat proc/interrupts, I see that:
>>> 0: 157 IO-APIC-edge timer
>>> How the system timer is attached on IO-APIC at the time that the
>>> IO-APIC
>>> is disabled on kernel configurations? Basically, the timer is not the
>>> only
>>> peripheral attached to IO-APIC as can be seen by /proc/interrupts.
>>>
>>> Here is the output of /proc/interrupts :
>>>
>>> CPU0
>>> 0: 157 IO-APIC-edge timer
>>> 1: 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042
>>> 4: 544 IO-APIC-edge serial
>>> 8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
>>> 9: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
>>> 12: 4 IO-APIC-edge i8042
>>> 14: 4 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
>>> 15: 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
>>> 16: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb5
>>> 18: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4
>>> 19: 45 IO-APIC-fasteoi ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb3
>>> 22: 149 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel
>>> 23: 72 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
>>> 27: 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
>>> NMI: 0 Non-maskable interrupts
>>> LOC: 1865130 Local timer interrupts
>> ^^^
>>This value should be incrementing at HZ freq.
>
> Are you sure about that? ASAIK the Local timer interrupts (generated
> by the LAPIC timer) are only used for timekeeping.
Actually local timer interrupts are more often used for per-cpu
scheduler ticks (as well as running per-cpu timers). Timekeeping is
done from only one cpu (usually 0, but that varies depending on
hotplug, etc).
> The system tick is
> generated by IRQ0 which in my second configuration should be triggered
> by HPET (because I have enabled the HPET timer support).
System tick?
> Also, if the
> interrupts generated by LAPIC are incremented at HZ freq, why the
> interrupts generated by the timer (IRQ0) not happen at the same frequency
> as well?
Why take two interrupts when you could only take one?
> Furthermore, we don't have an answer on why IO-APIC is used at the time
> that it is disabled on kernel configurations. The fact that I have enabled
> LAPIC timer support doesn't justify the use of the IO-APIC controller
> by each own.
Honestly, I dunno on the details there. If CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=n, it
looks like you should not be seeing the IO-APIC-* names in
/proc/interrupts. Are you sure your booting the right kernel, or
CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC is actally on in your .config?
>>Is there something your actually having problems with here? Ignoring
>>which interrupt line is used for the timer event, the system is
>>functioning properly, right?
>
> Yes, apart from that, everything is working OK but it's really important
> for me to get an answer on these issues.
Ok. I hope these aren't homework questions :)
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists