[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091208053851.GA12383@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:38:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@...il.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Timo Sirainen <tss@....fi>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl()
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > The feature looks useful, but the choice of a prctl as an API is strange
> > - it limits us to the current task only - while the ability to set
> > arguments for another task looks a more generic (and potentially more
> > useful) solution.
>
> No. It's impossible.
> /proc/{pid}/cmdline read user process's memory. iow, this prctl() don't
> receive string, it receive virtual address itself. [...]
it's not 'impossible' at all, you yourself mention ptrace:
> [...] I don't want any task allow to change another task's memory
> except ptrace.
And i did not mean to allow 'any' task to be allowed to do this -
security checks apply, obviously.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists