[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091209084341.GA21333@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:43:41 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/8] perf-probe updates
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> One hickup is that -d/--del does not appear to be working yet:
>
> # perf probe -l
> probe:schedule (on schedule)
>
> # perf probe -d probe:schedule
> Fatal: Failed to write event: Invalid argument
Ah, that was with an older kernel - a freshly booted kernel with
delete-probe syntax worked fine.
There's another small hickup i had - when i typoed 'perf probe -', it
gave me:
# perf probe -
No dwarf info found in the vmlinux - please rebuild with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO.
An error occurred in debuginfo analysis. Try to use symbols.
Fatal: Failed to write event: Invalid argument
Similar thing happens if i try to probe a non-existent symbol:
# perf probe test
No dwarf info found in the vmlinux - please rebuild with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO.
An error occurred in debuginfo analysis. Try to use symbols.
Fatal: Failed to write event: Invalid argument
I think we should print something more helpful, such as:
# perf probe test
Fatal: Kernel symbol 'test' not found - probe not added.
the debuginfo printout is not helpful in this case - we should fall back
to symbols silently, unless the nature of the error indicates that we
fail _because_ there's no debuginfo.
Here the failure was because the symbol does not exist.
There's similar problems in most other failure cases. Trying to remove a
non-existent probe gives:
# perf probe -d test
Warning: event "probe:test" is not found.
It should say something like:
# perf probe -d test
Info: event "probe:test" does not exist, could not remove it.
Also, it's possible to add multiple probes to the same function, using
'perf probe schedule' + 'perf probe schedule', etc. While in general it
makes sense to allow it, by default we should refuse the second,
identical probe on the symbol - and add a -f/--force option to force
duplicate probes. I.e. the second probe should print:
# perf probe schedule
Info: event "probe:schedule" already exists. (Use -f to force a duplicate.)
etc. Please try out various sensible and also less sensible options of
this tool and try to make it break - and see whether the behavior is
intuitive and obvious to users - whether the messages are consistent,
etc. etc.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists