[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3877989d0912090052v79fdce6aqb507639143b5d71e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:52:36 +0800
From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT, LOCKDEP_SUPPORT then
enable ftrace for ia64
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> But let me try more on other ia64 boxes that I can get access.
>>
>> Stay tuned.
>
> I might have reproduced the problem on a HP ia64 system
> with -32 kernel as the following info. But -31 kernel with
> lockdep code enabled just works. ....debugging...
ah, I seem to have found the change in -32 against -31 that causes the trouble.
Commenting out the change make -32 Lockdep kernel boot.
Tony, please let me know whether you can reproduce..
kernel/lockdep.c
static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
{
trace->nr_entries = 0;
trace->max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries;
trace->entries = stack_trace + nr_stack_trace_entries;
trace->skip = 3;
save_stack_trace(trace);
#if 0
/*
* Some daft arches put -1 at the end to indicate its a full trace.
*
* <rant> this is buggy anyway, since it takes a whole extra entry so a
* complete trace that maxes out the entries provided will be reported
* as incomplete, friggin useless </rant>
*/
if (trace->entries[trace->nr_entries-1] == ULONG_MAX)
trace->nr_entries--;
#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists