linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 4/6] cpu-timers: change SIGEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1260351598-4203-5-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 10:39:56 +0100
From:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/6] cpu-timers: change SIGEV_NONE timer handling

Currently when user setup timer without associated signal and process
not use any other cpu timers, we are running tsk->signal->cputimer
forewer, change that.

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c |   28 ++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 4716c8c..08506ff 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -614,7 +614,12 @@ static void arm_timer(struct k_itimer *timer)
  */
 static void cpu_timer_fire(struct k_itimer *timer)
 {
-	if (unlikely(timer->sigq == NULL)) {
+	if ((timer->it_sigev_notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID) == SIGEV_NONE) {
+		/*
+		 * User don't want any signal.
+		 */
+		timer->it.cpu.expires.sched = 0;
+	} else if (unlikely(timer->sigq == NULL)) {
 		/*
 		 * This a special case for clock_nanosleep,
 		 * not a normal timer from sys_timer_create.
@@ -783,7 +788,6 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
 	 */
 	timer->it.cpu.expires = new_expires;
 	if (new_expires.sched != 0 &&
-	    (timer->it_sigev_notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID) != SIGEV_NONE &&
 	    cpu_time_before(timer->it_clock, val, new_expires)) {
 		arm_timer(timer);
 	}
@@ -808,7 +812,6 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
 	timer->it_overrun = -1;
 
 	if (new_expires.sched != 0 &&
-	    (timer->it_sigev_notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID) != SIGEV_NONE &&
 	    !cpu_time_before(timer->it_clock, val, new_expires)) {
 		/*
 		 * The designated time already passed, so we notify
@@ -882,25 +885,6 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec *itp)
 		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	}
 
-	if ((timer->it_sigev_notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID) == SIGEV_NONE) {
-		if (timer->it.cpu.incr.sched == 0 &&
-		    cpu_time_before(timer->it_clock,
-				    timer->it.cpu.expires, now)) {
-			/*
-			 * Do-nothing timer expired and has no reload,
-			 * so it's as if it was never set.
-			 */
-			timer->it.cpu.expires.sched = 0;
-			itp->it_value.tv_sec = itp->it_value.tv_nsec = 0;
-			return;
-		}
-		/*
-		 * Account for any expirations and reloads that should
-		 * have happened.
-		 */
-		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
-	}
-
 	if (unlikely(clear_dead)) {
 		/*
 		 * We've noticed that the thread is dead, but
-- 
1.6.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/