[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1EF8AB.6010806@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:08:59 +0900
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, ak@...ux.intel.com,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm hugetlb x86: add hugepage support to pagemap
> I kind of dislike the practice of putting all the changelog in patch
> [0/n] and then leaving the patches themselves practically
> unchangelogged. Because
Sorry, I agree.
>
> a) Someone (ie: me) needs to go and shuffle all the text around so
> that the information gets itself into the git record. We don't add
> changelog-only commits to git!
>
> b) Someone (ie: me) might decide to backport a subset of the patches
> into -stable. Now someone (ie: me) needs to carve up the changelogs
> so that the pieces which go into -stable still make standalone sense.
>
> I'm not sure that I did this particularly well in this case. Oh well.
>
>
> Please confirm that
> mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-in-walk_page_range.patch is
> suitable for a -stable backport without inclusion of
> mm-hugetlb-add-hugepage-support-to-pagemap.patch. I think it is.
>
I think that's OK.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists