[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-cd29fe6f2637cc2ccbda5ac65f5332d6bf5fa3c6@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:54:22 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Sanitize fork() handling
Commit-ID: cd29fe6f2637cc2ccbda5ac65f5332d6bf5fa3c6
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cd29fe6f2637cc2ccbda5ac65f5332d6bf5fa3c6
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:32:46 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:03:05 +0100
sched: Sanitize fork() handling
Currently we try to do task placement in wake_up_new_task() after we do
the load-balance pass in sched_fork(). This yields complicated semantics
in that we have to deal with tasks on different RQs and the
set_task_cpu() calls in copy_process() and sched_fork()
Rename ->task_new() to ->task_fork() and call it from sched_fork()
before the balancing, this gives the policy a clear point to place the
task.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
kernel/sched_fair.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ca72ed4..31d9dec 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
- void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
+ void (*task_fork) (struct task_struct *p);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index c92670f..33c9035 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1811,6 +1811,20 @@ static void cfs_rq_set_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long shares)
static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq);
+static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ set_task_rq(p, cpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ /*
+ * After ->cpu is set up to a new value, task_rq_lock(p, ...) can be
+ * successfuly executed on another CPU. We must ensure that updates of
+ * per-task data have been completed by this moment.
+ */
+ smp_wmb();
+ task_thread_info(p)->cpu = cpu;
+#endif
+}
+
#include "sched_stats.h"
#include "sched_idletask.c"
#include "sched_fair.c"
@@ -1967,20 +1981,6 @@ inline int task_curr(const struct task_struct *p)
return cpu_curr(task_cpu(p)) == p;
}
-static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
-{
- set_task_rq(p, cpu);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * After ->cpu is set up to a new value, task_rq_lock(p, ...) can be
- * successfuly executed on another CPU. We must ensure that updates of
- * per-task data have been completed by this moment.
- */
- smp_wmb();
- task_thread_info(p)->cpu = cpu;
-#endif
-}
-
static inline void check_class_changed(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
const struct sched_class *prev_class,
int oldprio, int running)
@@ -2552,7 +2552,6 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
{
int cpu = get_cpu();
- unsigned long flags;
__sched_fork(p);
@@ -2586,13 +2585,13 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
+ if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
+ p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
#endif
- local_irq_save(flags);
- update_rq_clock(cpu_rq(cpu));
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
@@ -2625,17 +2624,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
BUG_ON(p->state != TASK_RUNNING);
update_rq_clock(rq);
-
- if (!p->sched_class->task_new || !current->se.on_rq) {
- activate_task(rq, p, 0);
- } else {
- /*
- * Let the scheduling class do new task startup
- * management (if any):
- */
- p->sched_class->task_new(rq, p);
- inc_nr_running(rq);
- }
+ activate_task(rq, p, 0);
trace_sched_wakeup_new(rq, p, 1);
check_preempt_curr(rq, p, WF_FORK);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 613c1c7..44ec80c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1922,28 +1922,30 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
}
/*
- * Share the fairness runtime between parent and child, thus the
- * total amount of pressure for CPU stays equal - new tasks
- * get a chance to run but frequent forkers are not allowed to
- * monopolize the CPU. Note: the parent runqueue is locked,
- * the child is not running yet.
+ * called on fork with the child task as argument from the parent's context
+ * - child not yet on the tasklist
+ * - preemption disabled
*/
-static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+static void task_fork_fair(struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
+ struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(current);
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se, *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
- sched_info_queued(p);
+ if (unlikely(task_cpu(p) != this_cpu))
+ __set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
update_curr(cfs_rq);
+
if (curr)
se->vruntime = curr->vruntime;
place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 1);
- /* 'curr' will be NULL if the child belongs to a different group */
- if (sysctl_sched_child_runs_first && this_cpu == task_cpu(p) &&
- curr && entity_before(curr, se)) {
+ if (sysctl_sched_child_runs_first && curr && entity_before(curr, se)) {
/*
* Upon rescheduling, sched_class::put_prev_task() will place
* 'current' within the tree based on its new key value.
@@ -1952,7 +1954,7 @@ static void task_new_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
resched_task(rq->curr);
}
- enqueue_task_fair(rq, p, 0);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
/*
@@ -2052,7 +2054,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.set_curr_task = set_curr_task_fair,
.task_tick = task_tick_fair,
- .task_new = task_new_fair,
+ .task_fork = task_fork_fair,
.prio_changed = prio_changed_fair,
.switched_to = switched_to_fair,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists