linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] i386: remove 'usedac' kernel parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:07:39 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	amwang@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	gcosta@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [Patch] i386: remove 'usedac' kernel parameter

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:25:48 -0500
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:

> It is scheduled to be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> index 591e944..8c895f6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
> @@ -291,13 +291,6 @@ Who:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
>  
>  ---------------------------
>  
> -What:	usedac i386 kernel parameter
> -When:	2.6.27
> -Why:	replaced by allowdac and no dac combination
> -Who:	Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
> -
> ----------------------------
> -

I'm not sure about the above description, I'm not against removing
this option though.

IIUC, the usedac option enables us to stop via_no_dac() setting
forbid_dac to 1. That is, someone who uses VIA bridges can use DAC
with this option even if some of VIA bridges seem to be broken about
DAC. I can't see how we can do the same thing with "allowdac" and
"nodac" combination.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/