lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912090709130.3560@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:12:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ollie Wild <aaw@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] mremap/mmap mess



On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> David: Yes, that's one of my fears too - I don't think
> rlimits would pose any new problem, but building up the argv+env below
> sp on the execer's userstack would be in danger of colliding with the
> vma below if the space allowed to that userstack is too small.

For threads, the stack is usually pretty small, so yeah, it would severely 
limit threads doing execve. 

That's supposed to be unusual and is frowned upon, but we've spent a fair 
amount of effort on making sure it works, so I think it would be 
unacceptable.

And I really don't see what the problem with our current approach is. We 
have a nice source array - the originating VM, and a nice destination 
array - the resulting VM, and trying to exchange that nice conceptual 
setup with another setup with _different_ problems that isn't even as 
clean sounds like a major mistake to me.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ