[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1FCB54.6000105@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:07:48 -0500
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [RFC] tracepoint: Add signal coredump tracepoint
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> + TP_fast_assign(
>> + __entry->sig = (int)cprm->signr;
>> + __entry->limit = cprm->limit;
>> + __entry->flags = cprm->mm_flags;
>> + __entry->retval = retval;
>> + __assign_str(name, core_name);
>> + ),
>> +
>> + TP_printk("sig=%d limit=%lu dumpable=0x%lx dump_filter=0x%lx "
>> + "corename=\"%s\" retval=%d",
>> + __entry->sig, __entry->limit,
>> + __entry->flags& MMF_DUMPABLE_MASK,
>> + (__entry->flags& MMF_DUMP_FILTER_MASK)>>
>> + MMF_DUMP_FILTER_SHIFT,
>> + __get_str(name), __entry->retval)
>> +);
>> #endif /* _TRACE_SIGNAL_H */
>
> I don't think "limit" is userfriendly name, core_limit or core_size_limit is better?
> plus, we have core_pipe_limit sysctl too. (it's similar but different concept limit).
Ah, I missed it. OK, so I'll rename core_limit and add core_pipe_limit.
Thank you for pointed it out :-)
>
> other parts looks good to me.
>
>
>
Thanks!
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists