[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1FF27E.8030701@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:54:54 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/paravirt for v2.6.33
On 12/09/2009 10:47 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> NOTE NOTE NOTE! Totally untested. Is the second argument even in %edx? I
> don't remember, I didn't check, I'm just throwing this out as a "hey,
> maybe something _like_ this can work" patch, and will be immediately
> removing it from my machine after sending this email.
>
The second argument is in %edx, but unlike 64 bits, it is not loaded
into that register a priory ("asmlinkage" means arguments are on the stack.)
As such, we need something looking like:
#define PTREGSCALL0(name) \
ptregs_##name: \
leal 4(%esp),%eax; \
jmp sys_##name
#define PTREGSCALL1(name) \
ptregs_##name: \
movl 4(%esp),%eax; \
leal 4(%esp),%edx; \
jmp sys_##name
#define PTREGSCALL2(name) \
ptregs_##name: \
movl 4(%esp),%eax; \
movl 8(%esp),%edx; \
leal 4(%esp),%ecx; \
jmp sys_##name
If we need more than two arguments + pt_regs, then we have to set up a
temporary stack frame.
[Sorry, I'm sitting in a meeting so I can't actually write up a real patch]
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists