linux-kernel - linux-next: origin tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091210105703.3e62245d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:57:03 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: origin tree build failure

Hi all,

Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/char/nvram.c: In function 'nvram_open':
drivers/char/nvram.c:332: error: implicit declaration of function 'lock_kernel'
drivers/char/nvram.c:339: error: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_kernel'

Caused by commit 9e8ab74ddaa591575f599248080a1f0d917a56ee ("nvram: Drop
the bkl from non-generic nvram_llseek()").

I do wonder why I never saw this commit in linux-next ...

I have added this the patch you posted to lkml:

From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:31:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] nvram: Fix missing smp_lock.h in nvram

The bkl has been removed from nvram_llseek() and smp_lock.h was
removed because another patch in the same tree zapped the remaining
usage of bkl in the same file. But this patch must have been excluded
later, then we still need the smp_lock.h headers for the bkl use
in nvram_open().

This fixes the following build error:

drivers/char/nvram.c: In function _nvram_open_:
drivers/char/nvram.c:332: erreur: implicit declaration of function _lock_kernel_
drivers/char/nvram.c:339: erreur: implicit declaration of function
_unlock_kernel_
make[2]: *** [drivers/char/nvram.o] Erreur 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/char] Erreur 2
make: *** [drivers] Erreur 2

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
 drivers/char/nvram.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c
index 2100a8f..4008e2c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
+++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/smp_lock.h>

 #include <asm/system.h>

-- 
1.6.2.3

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/