[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091210072351.GF16874@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:23:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf sched: Add max delay time snapshot
* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > When we have a maximum latency reported for a task, we need a
> > convenient way to find the matching location to the raw traces or to
> > perf sched map that shows where the task has been eventually
> > scheduled in. This gives a pointer to retrieve the events that
> > occured during this max latency.
>
> Then, we can cooperate with ftrace's data to know what the cpu is
> doing at that time.
What do you mean by mixing it with ftrace data? These events ought to be
a full replacement for the sched and wakeup tracers. In the long run we
want a single stream of events and phase out most of the pretty-printing
ftrace plugins.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists