[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091210083310.GB6834@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:33:10 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cl@...ux-foundation.org,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC mm][PATCH 2/5] percpu cached mm counter
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry If I miss your point...are you saying remove all mm_counter
> completely and remake them under perf ? If so, some proc file
> (/proc/<pid>/statm etc) will be corrupted ?
No, i'm not suggesting that - i'm just suggesting that right now MM
stats are not very well suited to be exposed via perf. If we wanted to
measure/sample the information in /proc/<pid>/statm it just wouldnt be
possible. We have a few events like pagefaults and a few tracepoints as
well - but more would be possible IMO.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists