linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091210192801.489f01b8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:28:01 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Maarten Maathuis <madman2003@...il.com>,
	Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm

> The fact is, if there are license questions, then Fedora had better not be 
> distributing the code either. And they clearly are.

Their choice, but it's not their project - they are just chosing to
import it.

> I've heard the "but it's hard to merge" excuse too - which I also know is 
> bullshit, because I can look at the git tree Fedora apparently uses, and 
> it merges without any conflicts what-so-ever.

So merge it - it's your call as the maintainer of the master tree - or put
it in staging and dike out the microcode - which is firmware tree stuff
*anyway*

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/