[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0912101317v8143e67w9e2f1224111ac0d7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:17:44 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: liqin.chen@...plusct.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's in asm-generic.git
2009/12/10 Arnd Bergmann:
> On Monday 07 December 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 07 December 2009, liqin.chen@...plusct.com wrote:
>> > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> 写于 2009-12-04 03:14:08:
>> >
>> > Maybe you can add a __NR_set_thread_area define in asm-generic/unsitd.h
>> > for tls used.
>>
>> Yes, good point. I'll update the syscall list with this, and also check if more
>> syscalls have been addded.
>
> I have found now that sys_accept4 was missing. sys_set_thread_area however
> is only defined on x86 and mips. Since you don't currently implement this
> on score, maybe it would be more appropriate to handle it like the other
> architectures do, rather than adding it to asm-generic/unistd.h?
isnt the point of asm-generic/unistd.h to collect all common syscalls
? if there's syscalls that ideally should be handled by everyone but
currently doesnt, then it's easy to define it in the header but have
the actual entry.S leave it as a hole ...
or maybe i'm missing what's going on
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists