[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091210212533.GD10388@shell>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:25:33 -0500
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
Sandu Popa Marius <sandupopamarius@...il.com>,
Jan Rekorajski <baggins@...h.mimuw.edu.pl>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vladimir Dronnikov <dronnikov@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/41] VFS: Remove unnecessary micro-optimization in cached_lookup()
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 09:07:39PM -0500, Erez Zadok wrote:
> In message <1256152779-10054-5-git-send-email-vaurora@...hat.com>, Valerie Aurora writes:
> > From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
> >
> > d_lookup() takes rename_lock which is a seq_lock. This is so cheap
> > it's not worth calling lockless __d_lookup() first from
> > cache_lookup(). Rename cached_lookup() to cache_lookup() while we're
> > there.
>
> Val, this is another patch unrelated to union mounts, an
> optimization/simplification of the VFS code. I think you need to try and
> push such VFS patches upstream more quickly, so as to reduce the set of UM
> patches you have to maintain.
I agree. We posted them separately once and will do so again.
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists