[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091210215550.7f092006@pedra>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:55:50 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with serial interrupts with IPMI 2.0 SoL
Em Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:45:54 -0800
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a system with an embedded IPMI 2.0 BMC which provides SoL
> (Supermicro X8SIL-F). This works fine under Linux (fully interrupt
> driven), but fails for Xen as it appears to not be sending interrupts;
> it works OK if I set the driver to polling mode.
>
> I'm assuming the Xen is tickling some bug in the emulated 16550. The
> Linux driver has a couple of pieces of code to explicitly work around
> bugs in the Intel AMT SoL implementation, but I don't think they're
> coming into play here (because there are no Intel SoL PCI devices on
> this system to trigger the NO_TXEN_TEST flag).
>
> I'm wondering if you have any pointers or suggestions about more subtle
> problems?
If you don't hit NO_TXEN_TEST flag, you'll be loosing interrupts, as the
emulation of 16550 is not perfect.
As far as I remember, interrupts take too long to happen with the emulated
16550, when comparing with a normal serial.
--
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists