[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B21EF6D.4070207@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:06:21 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Define kmem_trace_alloc_notrace unconditionally
>>>> Always define kmem_trace_alloc_{,node}_notrace(), otherwise
>>>> perf-kmem will show wrong stats ifndef CONFIG_KMEMTRACE,
>>>> because a kmalloc() memory allocation may be traced by
>>>> both trace_kmalloc() and trace_kmem_cache_alloc().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
>>> Did you check how much this will make kernel text bigger because of the
>>> inlining happening in kmem_cache_alloc_notrace()?
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I understood what you meant, but I'm not inlining
>> kmem_cache_alloc_notrace(), and instead I'm removing the inline
>> version in !CONFIG_KMEMTRACE case.
>
> In SLUB, slab_alloc() will be inlined to kmem_cache_alloc_notrace()
> increasing mm/slub.o size so we don't want to define
> kmem_cache_alloc_notrace() unconditionally.
>
I got your point. I'll make a new patch based on your suggestion.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists