[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1260522580.2442.22.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:09:40 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, hidave.darkstar@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mmotm-2009-12-08-17-45 resume slowly
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 14:29 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:52:51 +0900 (JST)
>
> > (cc to netdev)
> >
> > Hi net-folks
> >
> >> > [ .,A 561.323866] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old:
> >> > write-back new: write-combining
> >> > [ 2688.500033] No probe response from AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b after
> >> > 500ms, disconnecting.
> >> > [ 2689.580376] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b (try 1)
> >
> > What's mean "No probe response"? Why its point waste 2000sec?
>
> I think you'll get more responses from the wireless list,
> replacing netdev with linux-wireless in the CC:...
That is definitely done asynchronously, there's no reason it should
delay the resume.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists