[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B222C3D.2070807@icdsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:25:49 +0200
From: Ivan Zahariev <famzah@...soft.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Ivan Zahariev <famzah@...soft.com>
Subject: EUID != root + EGID = root, and CAP_SETGID
Hi guys,
Currently, if a process is started with EUID which is non-root, and EGID
which IS root (for example by set-group-ID file permission + file group
owner "root", or an account in /etc/passwd with group=0), then the
processes is not granted CAP_SETGID.
As a result, such a process cannot change its EGID to an arbitrary one,
even though the current EGID is the super-user "root" one. Therefore,
such a process cannot easily drop its EGID "root" privileges to non-root
ones, for security reasons.
This is not the case if the process starts with EUID=0. Then the
processes is granted *both* CAP_SETUID and CAP_SETGID.
Is this an intended behavior? Shouldn't a process which is started with
EGID=0 get CAP_SETGID too?
Thank you.
Best regads,
Ivan Zahariev
P.S. For more detailed info:
http://blog.famzah.net/2009/12/11/linux-non-root-user-processes-which-run-with-group-root-cannot-change-their-process-group-to-an-arbitrary-one/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists