[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091211120218.GD5244@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:02:20 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing/filters: Fix MATCH_FRONT_ONLY filter
matching
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 05:59:28PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> MATCH_FRONT_ONLY matching works exactly as MATCH_FULL.
>
> We should pass the length of the pattern to strncmp().
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> index c8eb1c0..bd492ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static int regex_match_full(char *str, struct regex *r, int len)
>
> static int regex_match_front(char *str, struct regex *r, int len)
> {
> - if (strncmp(str, r->pattern, len) == 0)
> + if (strncmp(str, r->pattern, r->len) == 0)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
But it was working before the fix to match full.
The MATCH_FULL fix is nice but it also brings a new bug that
is fixed in this patch.
Could you perhaps rework the MATCH_FULL fix to avoid that?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists