linux-kernel - Re: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13740.1260540082@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:01:22 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> 1) held spinlocks are not equivalent to rcu_read_lock
> 
> 2) access to current_cred() is safe as only current can modify its
>    own credentials.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/