[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1260543626.2146.357.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:00:26 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add checks for printing graph irq
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:38 +0800, Wenji Huang wrote:
> Check return value of trace_seq_printf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> index 45e6c01..3fa4055 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> @@ -555,8 +555,11 @@ print_graph_irq(struct trace_iterator *iter, unsigned long addr,
> return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> /* Don't close the duration column if haven't one */
> - if (tracer_flags.val & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION)
> - trace_seq_printf(s, " |");
> + if (tracer_flags.val & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_DURATION) {
> + ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " |");
> + if (!ret)
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + }
> ret = trace_seq_printf(s, "\n");
Actually these checks are no longer needed. I would like to start
removing them. Only the last one is needed.
This is because trace_seq_* now has a "full" attribute. If the s buffer
gets full, it wont write anymore, and all new "trace_seq_*" calls will
return the same.
-- Steve
>
> if (!ret)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists