| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:34:49 -0500 From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "C. Bergstr?m" <cbergstrom@...hscale.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:32:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > "patches welcome" > > The problem is that I have never even heard a Red Hat or Fedora person > actually acknoledge that yes, they should be trying to upstream it. > > Have Red Hat and Fedora just decided that "upstream first" simply doesn't > matter any more? Because quite frankly, that was kind of the feeling I > came away with from the Kernel summit. > Well, given that none of the Fedora kernel people were able to attend this year for a variety of reasons, this is an interesting revelation to me, I wasn't aware I thought this. I, for one, would very much like nouveau to be upstream. It would certainly make my life easier not having to worry about subtlely breaking graphics adapters I can't test whenever we rebase to new git changes in the DRM. Thankfully Ben and Dave have been ninja at dealing with it, otherwise I probably would have punted it by now. > It's like they _want_ to keep it internal. > regards, Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists