[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091211173424.GC15760@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:34:24 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>
Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled
> >> If there are none, fine.
> >>
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >>> # define preemptible() (preempt_count() == 0 && !irqs_disabled())
> >>> # define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET (HARDIRQ_OFFSET-1)
> >>> #else
> >>> # define preemptible() 0
> >>> # define IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET HARDIRQ_OFFSET
> >>> #endif
> >>>
> >
> > Well, normally we want low latency even for !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels.
> >
> > Actually, explicit preemption points are NOPs for CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > kernels, right?
> Right. Do you have code?
I'd prefer to spend my time with patches to areas that actually do
take cleanup patches.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists