[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091211204014.GA30776@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:40:14 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
To: ext sai pavan <saipavan.243@...il.com>
Cc: "Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@...il.com>,
Madhusudhan Chikkature <madhu.cr@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] usb: otg: twl4030: add support for notifier
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:22:14PM +0100, ext sai pavan wrote:
>> @@ -628,7 +628,8 @@ static irqreturn_t twl4030_usb_irq(int irq, void *_twl)
>> else
>> twl4030_phy_resume(twl);
>>
>> - twl4030charger_usb_en(status == USB_LINK_VBUS);
>> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&twl->otg.notifier, status,
>> + twl->otg.gadget);
>> }
>
>You might not want to invoke blocking notifier chain(may sleep) from
>interrupt context. May be atomic notifier chain is appropriate here.
that's a threaded irq. Maybe we should patch all twl children to use
request_threaded_irq() already. I'll test that tomorrow.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists