linux-kernel - Re: [patch 8/9] Documentation: Fix invalid rcu assumptions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200912112128.25954.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:28:25 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegardno@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] Documentation: Fix invalid rcu assumptions

On Thursday 10 December 2009 00:53:26 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/Documentation/credentials.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/Documentation/credentials.txt
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/Documentation/credentials.txt
> @@ -408,9 +408,6 @@ This should be used inside the RCU read 
>                 ...
>         }
>  
> -A function need not get RCU read lock to use __task_cred() if it is holding a
> -spinlock at the time as this implicitly holds the RCU read lock.
> -
>  Should it be necessary to hold another task's credentials for a long period of
>  time, and possibly to sleep whilst doing so, then the caller should get a
>  reference on them using:

How about changing the documentation to explain why you can't just use a spinlock
or local_irq_disable instead of rcu_read_lock? You explained it well in your
[patch 0/9], but that part had not occurred to me yet and having it in the kernel
sources might prevent more people from getting it wrong in the future.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/