[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091211034711.GA2773@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:11 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <ext-jani.1.nikula@...ia.com>,
dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dsilvers@...tec.co.uk, ben@...tec.co.uk,
Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpiolib: use chip->names for symlinks, always use
gpioN for device names
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:39:30PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > While the device names are now unique again, collisions in chip->names
> > will still prevent duplicates from being exported to sysfs.
>
> That's why I was never a real fan of chip->names...
>
> IMO a "good" solution in this space needs to accept that
> those names are not going to be globally unique ... but
> that they'll be unique within some context, of necessity.
>
> If Greg doesn't want to see those names under classes,
> so be it ... but where should they then appear?
As a sysfs file within the device directory called 'name'? Then just
grep through the tree to find the right device, that also handles
duplicates just fine, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists