lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:47:11 -0800
From:	Greg KH <>
To:	David Brownell <>
Cc:	Jani Nikula <>,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpiolib: use chip->names for symlinks, always use
	gpioN for device names

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:39:30PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > While the device names are now unique again, collisions in chip->names
> > will still prevent duplicates from being exported to sysfs.
> That's why I was never a real fan of chip->names...
> IMO a "good" solution in this space needs to accept that
> those names are not going to be globally unique ... but
> that they'll be unique within some context, of necessity.
> If Greg doesn't want to see those names under classes,
> so be it ... but where should they then appear?

As a sysfs file within the device directory called 'name'?  Then just
grep through the tree to find the right device, that also handles
duplicates just fine, right?


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists