| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B2532A0.2070001@goop.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:29:52 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor KVM guest performance on an HP rack server
On 12/13/09 02:12, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Hmm, that's because we're using/developing a Linux distribution which
> doesn't have 64-bit support yet. But since the guest will be a
> compile-farm for our needs, it's worth trying to run an 64-bit distro on
> the host to see the difference, thanks for the tip but how much should
> this affect the performance?
32-bit PAE is marginal above 4G of memory and the limit is at about 8G.
Above that, so much lowmem (<~1GB) is occupied by page and other kernel
structures that there's barely any memory to do any real work. If this
is what's happening, you'd expect to see poor host performance, and slow
guest performance would be secondary to that.
With 64-bit, all the memory can be directly addressed so none of this
applies. I would expect to see significant performance gains.
There's nothing to stop you from running 32-bit PAE guests, so you can
do your distro development that way (at least in part).
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists