linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] TTY patches for 2.6.33-git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1260729195.2612.7.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:33:15 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] TTY patches for 2.6.33-git

On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 19:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: 
> When we did the BKL-as-a-mutex trick and let lockdep loose on it, three areas 
> were particularly tricky: tty, reiser3 and NFS. tty and reiserfs should be ok 
> now, but i havent seen much activity on the NFS front.

I've got a couple of NFS bkl removal patches queued up that I'll send on
to Linus today, but they will not suffice to fully remove BKL from the
NFS code.

The main remaining problem area is that of file locking (i.e. anything
that references inode->i_flock). I've started work on that, but a couple
of higher interrupts have prevented me from pulling it all together in
time for this merge window...

Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/