[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091213192003.GC7297@nowhere>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:20:05 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] TTY patches for 2.6.33-git
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:09:14PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 20:04 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > In the above cases we have the following comment:
> >
> > /* Protect inode->i_flock using the BKL */
> >
> > And really it doesn't seem to protect anything else,
> > fortunately it is acquired in a short path.
>
> As I said in my reply, this is the tough one, because the BKL protection
> is imposed by the VFS locking scheme used in fs/locks.c.
>
> There is a similar dependency imposed upon fs/lockd/
Ok.
> > fs/nfs/super.c: unlock_kernel();
> > fs/nfs/super.c: unlock_kernel();
> >
> > Protect the mount/unmount path, a bit trickier there.
> >
> > But really that looks way much easier to fix than it was
> > with reiserfs.
>
> All the other cases you list should be fixed in the GIT PULL request
> that I just put out.
>
Cool, thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists