linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86: fix checking of SRAT when node0 ram is not from 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B249143.5050300@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:01:23 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix checking of SRAT when node0 ram is not from 0


Found one system that boot from socket1 instead of socket0, SRAT get rejected...

[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 0-a0000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 100000-80000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 0 100000000-2080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 1 2080000000-4080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 2 4080000000-6080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 3 PXM 3 6080000000-8080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 4 PXM 4 8080000000-a080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 5 PXM 5 a080000000-c080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 6 PXM 6 c080000000-e080000000
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 7 PXM 7 e080000000-10080000000
...
[    0.000000] NUMA: Allocated memnodemap from 500000 - 701040
[    0.000000] NUMA: Using 20 for the hash shift.
[    0.000000] Adding active range (0, 0x2080000, 0x4080000) 0 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x0, 0x96) 1 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x100, 0x7f750) 2 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (1, 0x100000, 0x2080000) 3 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (2, 0x4080000, 0x6080000) 4 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (3, 0x6080000, 0x8080000) 5 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (4, 0x8080000, 0xa080000) 6 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (5, 0xa080000, 0xc080000) 7 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (6, 0xc080000, 0xe080000) 8 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] Adding active range (7, 0xe080000, 0x10080000) 9 entries of 3200 used
[    0.000000] SRAT: PXMs only cover 917504MB of your 1048566MB e820 RAM. Not used.
[    0.000000] SRAT: SRAT not used.

the early_node_map is not sorted because node0 with non zero start come first.

so try to sort it right away after all regions are registered.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>


---
 arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c |    2 ++
 arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |    2 ++
 include/linux/mm.h    |    1 +
 mm/page_alloc.c       |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_32.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ int __init get_memcfg_from_srat(void)
 		e820_register_active_regions(chunk->nid, chunk->start_pfn,
 					     min(chunk->end_pfn, max_pfn));
 	}
+	/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
+	sort_node_map();
 
 	for_each_online_node(nid) {
 		unsigned long start = node_start_pfn[nid];
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -373,6 +373,8 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long
 	for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed)
 		e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
 						nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+	/* for out of order entries in SRAT */
+	sort_node_map();
 	if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) {
 		bad_srat();
 		return -1;
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1022,6 +1022,7 @@ extern void add_active_range(unsigned in
 extern void remove_active_range(unsigned int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
 					unsigned long end_pfn);
 extern void remove_all_active_ranges(void);
+void sort_node_map(void);
 extern unsigned long absent_pages_in_range(unsigned long start_pfn,
 						unsigned long end_pfn);
 extern void get_pfn_range_for_nid(unsigned int nid,
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4102,7 +4102,7 @@ static int __init cmp_node_active_region
 }
 
 /* sort the node_map by start_pfn */
-static void __init sort_node_map(void)
+void __init sort_node_map(void)
 {
 	sort(early_node_map, (size_t)nr_nodemap_entries,
 			sizeof(struct node_active_region),
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/