[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0912131749j3fc1d539m8b65c960026d3535@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:49:42 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keys: KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT needs TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
architecture support
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 14:21, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> As of commit ee18d64c1f632043a02e6f5ba5e045bb26a5465f ("KEYS: Add a keyctl to
> install a process's session keyring on its parent [try #6]"), CONFIG_KEYS=y
> fails to build on architectures that haven't implemented TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME yet:
>
> security/keys/keyctl.c: In function 'keyctl_session_to_parent':
> security/keys/keyctl.c:1312: error: 'TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME' undeclared (first use in this function)
> security/keys/keyctl.c:1312: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> security/keys/keyctl.c:1312: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> Make KEYCTL_SESSION_TO_PARENT depend on TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME until blackfin,
> m68k, and xtensa have implemented it.
i'll be pushing a patch for 2.6.32 to add notify support to Blackfin ;)
but othewise, Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists