[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091214104423X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:06:15 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: gcosta@...hat.com, amwang@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] remove usedac in feature-removal-schedule.txt
The reason of removal, "replaced by allowdac and no dac combination"
is incorrect. There is no way to do the same thing with "allowdac" and
"nodac" combination.
The usedac option enables us to stop via_no_dac() setting forbid_dac
to 1. That is, someone who uses VIA bridges can use DAC with this
option even if some of VIA bridges seem to be broken about DAC.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 7 -------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 2a4d779..eb2c138 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -291,13 +291,6 @@ Who: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
---------------------------
-What: usedac i386 kernel parameter
-When: 2.6.27
-Why: replaced by allowdac and no dac combination
-Who: Glauber Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
-
----------------------------
-
What: print_fn_descriptor_symbol()
When: October 2009
Why: The %pF vsprintf format provides the same functionality in a
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists