[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260759135-6450-2-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:52:14 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem
The commit 75f1cdf1dda92cae037ec848ae63690d91913eac introduced a bug
that we initialize SWIOTLB right after dma32_free_bootmem so we
wrongly steal memory area allocated for GART with broken BIOS earlier.
This moves swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem().
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
index afcc58b..fcc2f2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
@@ -120,11 +120,14 @@ static void __init dma32_free_bootmem(void)
void __init pci_iommu_alloc(void)
{
+ int use_swiotlb;
+
+ use_swiotlb = pci_swiotlb_init();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/* free the range so iommu could get some range less than 4G */
dma32_free_bootmem();
#endif
- if (pci_swiotlb_init())
+ if (use_swiotlb)
return;
gart_iommu_hole_init();
--
1.5.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists