linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5 -v2] acpi, apei, Document for APEI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:44:55 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc:	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 -v2] acpi, apei, Document for APEI

On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:58 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: 
> On Thursday 10 December 2009 12:17:04 am Huang Ying wrote:
> > Add document for APEI, including kernel parameters and EINJ debug file
> > sytem interface.
> 
> From a stylistic point of view, I think it's better if the
> documentation is added by the same patch that adds the functionality.
> Having them in separate patches means there's a point in time where
> the tree contains the functionality but not the documentation, or
> vice versa.

Sounds reasonable, I will change this.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/