| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091214111841.GA1959@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:18:41 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Constify struct address_space_operations for 2.6.32-git-053fe57ac v2 On Mon 2009-12-14 02:33:27, Emese Revfy wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:59:08AM +0100, re.emese@...il.com wrote: > >> From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> > >> > >> Hello everyone! > >> > >> The following patch series attempts to constify several structures > >> that hold function pointers. This is only the initial batch, there > >> are about over 150 candidate structures, some of which can be > >> constified as well, I plan to submit them in the future. > > > > What a complete waste of time. Until you respond to Al's: > > I did: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/5/140 Yes, you said we should ignore the patches. > For even more discussion see: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/6/111 I don't think you explained why we want the patches. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists