[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091214212936.BBBA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:30:19 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] Use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() instead prepare_to_wait()
if we don't use exclusive queue, wake_up() function wake _all_ waited
task. This is simply cpu wasting.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index e0cb834..3562a2d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ static int shrink_zone_begin(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
* we would just make things slower.
*/
for (;;) {
- prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (atomic_read(&zone->concurrent_reclaimers) <=
max_zone_concurrent_reclaimers)
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ static int shrink_zone_begin(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
*/
if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, sc->order, low_wmark_pages(zone),
0, 0)) {
- wake_up(wq);
+ wake_up_all(wq);
finish_wait(wq, &wait);
sc->nr_reclaimed += sc->nr_to_reclaim;
return -ERESTARTSYS;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists