[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B265C34.6070205@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:39:32 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
CC: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: fix synchronization on connection close
Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:41:42PM +0800, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
>> commit 9d3a0de makes slaves expire as they would do on the master
>> with much shorter timeouts. But it introduces another problem:
>> When we close a connection, on master server the connection became
>> CLOSE_WAIT/TIME_WAIT, it was synced to slaves, but if master is
>> finished within it's timeouts (CLOSE), it will not be synced to
>> slaves. Then slaves will be kept on CLOSE_WAIT/TIME_WAIT until
>> timeout reaches. Thus we should also sync with CLOSE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>
>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
>> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> This seems reasonable to me.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists