[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260832942.4387.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:22:22 -0800
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Defer skb allocation -- add destroy buffers
function for virtio
Hello Michael,
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 22:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I dont insist, but my idea was
>
> for (;;) {
> b = vq->destroy(vq);
> if (!b)
> break;
> --vi->num;
> put_page(b);
> }
>
> so we do not have to lose track of the counter.
That's not a bad idea, but to do this, then this fuction will be
specific for virtio_net device (vi is virtnet_info) only in a generic
virtqueue API.
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists