[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091215084903.CDAA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:51:11 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, minchan.kim@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Stop reclaim quickly when the task reclaimed enough lots pages
> On 12/14/2009 07:31 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >
> > From latency view, There isn't any reason shrink_zones() continue to
> > reclaim another zone's page if the task reclaimed enough lots pages.
>
> IIRC there is one reason - keeping equal pageout pressure
> between zones.
>
> However, it may be enough if just kswapd keeps evening out
> the pressure, now that we limit the number of concurrent
> direct reclaimers in the system.
>
> Since kswapd does not use shrink_zones ...
Sure. That's exactly my point.
plus, balance_pgdat() scan only one node. then zone balancing is
meaingfull. but shrink_zones() scan all zone in all node. we don't
need inter node balancing. it's vmscan's buisiness.
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists