[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B273479.6050502@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:02:17 +0800
From: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>, stable@...nel.org,
Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: unify iwl_setup_rxon_timing
Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:45:10AM +0800, Ike Panhc wrote:
>> This patch unifies setup_rxon_timing funcions
>> of AGN and 3945. HWs differ only in supported maximal
>> beacon interval. This is reflected in hw_paras.max_beacon_itrvl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>
>> (cherry picked from commit 2c2f3b33888419fb9e7d015b9dc67b9db4437efa)
>>
>> Conflicts:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
>
> What does this mean?
>
After cherry-pick:
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
@@@ -625,7 -608,7 +625,11 @@@ struct iwl_hw_params
u8 max_stations;
u8 bcast_sta_id;
u8 fat_channel;
++<<<<<<< HEAD:drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
+ u8 sw_crypto;
++=======
+ u8 max_beacon_itrvl; /* in 1024 ms */
++>>>>>>> 2c2f3b3... iwlwifi: unify iwl_setup_rxon_timing:drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
u32 max_inst_size;
u32 max_data_size;
u32 max_bsm_size;
The sw_crypto is removed in the prior commit (90e8e4), and the commit
is not in the stable tree. We still need sw_crypto.
So, the patch is modified to keep sw_crypto.
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-dev.h
@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ struct iwl_hw_params {
u8 bcast_sta_id;
u8 fat_channel;
u8 sw_crypto;
+ u8 max_beacon_itrvl; /* in 1024 ms */
u32 max_inst_size;
u32 max_data_size;
u32 max_bsm_size;
>> CC: stable@...nel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@...onical.com>
>>
>> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496496
>
> What are you expecting this patch to be applied to?
>
> confused,
Please consider applying to linux-2.6.31.y
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists