[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091215201039V.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:10:48 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, yinghai@...nel.org,
rdreier@...co.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before
dma32_free_bootmem"
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:56:50 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > There are a few people who hit this. How many people use a box with over
> > 256GB memory?
> >
> > And you can work around this with "dma32_size" kernel boot option.
>
> Well, since the kernel has not crashed before this change there's really just
> two options as per upstream kernel regression policy: either we fix it or we
> revert it.
As I wrote, here is a patch that can be applied to cleanly to the git
head:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/misc/0001-x86-two-stage-swiotlb-initialization.patch
It fixes the problem. Yinghai, can you test it? It should work but
it's good to confirm it.
I simply wanted to say that it's not a bug that breaks lots of boxes
or leads to something serious like data corruption (no need to say
something like "revert it now!"). It's also worth investigating why it
breaks, I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists