[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091215114351.GA32722@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:43:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before
dma32_free_bootmem"
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:56:50 +0100
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> >> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >>> There are a few people who hit this. How many people use a box with over
> >>> 256GB memory?
> >>>
> >>> And you can work around this with "dma32_size" kernel boot option.
> >> Well, since the kernel has not crashed before this change there's really just
> >> two options as per upstream kernel regression policy: either we fix it or we
> >> revert it.
> >
> > As I wrote, here is a patch that can be applied to cleanly to the git
> > head:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/misc/0001-x86-two-stage-swiotlb-initialization.patch
> >
> > It fixes the problem. Yinghai, can you test it? It should work but
> > it's good to confirm it.
>
> i tested already, it works.
Ok, mind someone please resend the agreed-upon patch with a Tested-by/Acked-by
line so that i can apply it?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists