linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the voltage tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1260885884.31691.72.camel@keskisaa-workstation>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:04:44 +0200
From:	Juha Keski-Saari <ext-juha.1.keski-saari@...ia.com>
To:	ext Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc:	"Ujfalusi Peter (Nokia-D/Tampere)" <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Valentin Eduardo (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the voltage tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:14 +0100, ext Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 09:48 +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:38 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Liam,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the voltage tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c between commit
> > > 441a450554dada1c59fc06fdf068cb0eeba53c6d ("regulator: Add support for
> > > twl6030 regulators") from Linus' tree and commits
> > > 6360cf42ae51be5f6e6e72d6e81f202d9db0f7e9 ("twl4030-regulator: Remove
> > > regulator from all groups when disabling") and
> > > 3277b9fce0fcaa68d5947429e062163852ebc6fb ("twl4030-regulator: Add all TWL
> > > regulators to twreg_info") from the voltage tree.
> > > 
> > > I cannot begin to fix this mess up.  I do wonder why the regulator patch
> > > above was never in linux-next before being sent upstream yesterday
> > > (Samuel?).  All I can do is use the version of the voltage tree from
> > > next-20091120 (commit id b0a7a2ad0aebb35934de6d2509c73fe93a362c0e) for
> > > today and hope that Liam can do the merge with Linus' tree.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sorry about this. There were some large patch sets that did span both
> > mfd and regulator recently.
> > 
> > I'll fix and do my pull request today.
> 
> Peter, Juha,
> 
> I've fixed up regulator for-next against upstream and now get a build
> failure on twl-regulator.c (possibly related to mfd/twl-codec.c build
> failure today ?)
> Can you check this and send me patch before I issue a pull request.
> Fwiw, the regulator pull request is now blocking on this issue.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Liam

Hi Liam

I should be able to fix at the very least most of those during tomorrow,
it appears that some changes with the 6030 additions confused the
patches I sent to you earlier. I'll send you a patch tomorrows

Best regards,
Juha K-S


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/