[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B27A458.4090005@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:59:36 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 6/8] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc
Le 15/12/2009 15:46, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Le 14/12/2009 23:03, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>>> this_cpu_inc() translates into a single instruction on x86 and does not
>>> need any register. So use it in stat(). We also want to avoid the
>>> calculation of the per cpu kmem_cache_cpu structure pointer. So pass
>>> a kmem_cache pointer instead of a kmem_cache_cpu pointer.
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, last time I checked, [__]this_cpu_inc were not using "inc" on x86,
>> but the default [__]this_cpu_add((pcp), 1)
>
> Well the add 1 is still a single instruction so its okay. We can easily
> add support for inc on x86 if makes a difference?
>
Probably not, only one byte of text per use can be saved.
Sorry, rereading your changelog I dont know why I thought about "inc" instruction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists