linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:50:57 +0900
From:	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information

(2009/12/15 6:46), Mike Travis wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> When running the latest kernel, I still find these in the output:
> 
> 
> [    0.722553] Booting Node   0, Processors  #1
> [    0.811625] CPU 1 MCA banks SHD:0 SHD:1 CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6
> SHD:7 SHD:8 SHD:9 SHD:12 SHD:13 SHD:14 SHD:15 SHD:16 SHD:17 SHD:18
> SHD:19 SHD:20 SHD:21
> [    0.812071]  #2
> [    0.907468] CPU 2 MCA banks SHD:0 SHD:1 CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6
> SHD:7 SHD:8 SHD:9 SHD:12 SHD:13 SHD:14 SHD:15 SHD:16 SHD:17 SHD:18
> SHD:19 SHD:20 SHD:21
> [    0.907918]  #3
> [    1.003311] CPU 3 MCA banks SHD:0 SHD:1 CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6
> SHD:7 SHD:8 SHD:9 SHD:12 SHD:13 SHD:14 SHD:15 SHD:16 SHD:17 SHD:18
> SHD:19 SHD:20 SHD:21
> [    1.003750]  #4
> 
> Was there anything else needed for this patch to be accepted? If it's
> not acceptable, would simply printing the above as DEBUG
> messages be acceptable?  (I'm aware you don't like printing
> summaries during init.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike

I have an updated patch, so let's continue on the new thread if needed.


Thanks,
H.Seto

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/