linux-kernel - Re: kexec boot regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B27E817.6030705@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:48:39 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	rdreier@...co.com, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kexec boot regression

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix
>>
>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it
> 
> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the
> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue?
> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work.

that patch will be bullet proof... we need it.

also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly.

do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in second kernel?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/